CUKDITMILS: THIS EXOTIC WMPON 


CATEGORIES 
| Select Category 

BLOGROLL 
** MENU ** 

ARCHIVES BY 
MONTH 

| Select Month 

ADMIN 
Register 
Log in 

Entries RSS 
Comments RSS 
WordPress.com 


N ovember 10, 2014 

1966 NASA Document Reveals Goal 

of Engineered “Climate 
Modification” 16 

Chemtrail, Global Warming • Tags: chemtrails, climate change, CLimate-Gate, david 
keith, geoengineeing, IPCC, Ken Caldeira 



TWITTER 

Gainesville Florida Commission Selects New City 
Auditor wp.me/p4KQj2-1c (:-) 1 day ago 

^Follow @Hsaive 



Sto ry 

“Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather- 
Climate Modification” 


This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of government 
agencies in perpetual and secret collaboration and the military to 
Modify the Global climate . Created by the elitist National Academy 
of Sciences - decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains 
why the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering (chemtrails) is a taboo 
topic to be degraded to the status of “conspiracy theory” by a matrix of 
complicit bureaucrats at every opportunity. This is why the FAA, 

NOAA, NASA and your local TV “meteorologist” refuse to employ 
scientific observation when asked to comment on an unusual sky filled 
with bizarre aircraft spraying. 

“The gradually accumulating evidence of positive results from 
efforts at weather modification led the Committee on 

Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of 
Sciences , in November 1963, to appoint a Panel on Weather 
and Climate Modification “to undertake a deliberate and 
thoughtful review of the present status and activities in this field 
and of its potential and limitations for the future.” - Page 6. 

“The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into 

a Military Weapons System” 

This Federation of American Scientists document is a 1986 
Critique of the 1966 NASA initiative where the author 
(Leitenburg?) characterizes NASA’s Weather Mod Program as 
hijacked into a military weapons system. This document is 
one of several found in: Studies of Military R&D and Weapons 



MOST RECENT POSTS 

ICE AGE COMETH? North Pole Frozen Solid - 
South Pole Re-Freezing 
February 28, 2015 

Scientist Investigates How Carbon Black 
Aerosols Melt Arctic Ice 
February 28, 2015 

ETC Group Launches Geoengineering Monitor 
Watchdog Site 
February 26, 2015 

Aircraft Electromagnetic Interference Could 
Accidentally Fire a Missile 
February 24, 2015 

Carnicom Institute: Environmental Filament Next 
Phase Research Begins 
February 18, 2015 

Carbon Black Chemtrails is Owning The 
Weather in 2025 
February 17, 2015 

Documentary Exposes CDC Corrupt To Core in 
Vaccine Scandal 
February 13, 2015 

Geoengineers Recommend Climate Engineering 
Testing Start Now 
February 11,2015 

Debunking The Dubunkers of Chemtrails and 
Climate Weapons 
February 10, 2015 

EXPOSED: Eco-Terrorism of Navy 
Electromagnetic Warfare Exercises 
February 10, 2015 

Carbon Black Chemtrails Finally Forcing Global 
Warming After 18 Years? 

February 9, 2015 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 1 / 23 








































Development by Milton Leitenberg, Senior Research Scholar - Center 
for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, College 
Park. Leitenburg is author of several books. (Amazon Books) 

A 2014 Book of important, relative interest: “ The Deliberate 

Corruption of Climate Science” by Tim Ball, PhD 



Geoengineering Proposals to Warm 
the Climate Regarded as a Good Idea 


1962 


„ Geoengineers Say Climate Warming 
Requires Solar Radiation Management 




Memory Loss 


It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue 

to push C02 as the cause for climate change 
but refuse to acknowledge the military has 
been actively engaged in Climate Warming 
Weapons Technologies for decades. 



Frflncii writer, Verne 
eali-MMdln^y capability to.priitclpart* tfS 
stfenlllle dlscwairtea ad ihe iwanthih 
wnlunr. In ti»e nwtf, From me Earth to 
HM Af*Jn, penned In 184§s tt»a Ijflnsty 
trnaglnabls notion *T people striding the 
Uir^r surface, reality 1M yesrt 

tom. m. 


THE FUTUPJf. 

^SNT WHAT Tt 

; 'USED TOW 

■■ A PH3LATEUC LOOK 
: ■ ' AT SCIENCE FlCim. 


Nevada TV Station Says Chemtrails “Are Not 
Natural Clouds” 

February 9, 2015 

Toxic Rain Falls on Washington, Oregon, 

and Idaho 

February 8, 2015 

Chemtrails Are Coal Ash - Really? 

February 7, 2015 

Are Those White Lines In The Sky Just 
Your Imagination? 

February 5, 2015 

URGENT GOFUNDME: Send Geoengineering 
Activist to AAAS Conference 
February 3, 2015 

TARFOX: International Global Atmospheric 
Chemistry Project 
February 1,2015 

New Evidence Questions Legitimacy of 
Obama Presidency 
January 30, 2015 

WASHINGTON POST: Chemtrails Could Derail 
Climate Policy Debate 
January 24, 2015 

Chemtrails Originate Inside the Turbofan 
Bypass Stage 
January 23, 2015 

GLOBAL WARMING BUSTED: Fleet of Jets 
Spray Black Carbon Chemtrails 
January 20, 2015 

Carbon Black Chemtrails Weaponized Hurricane 
Sandy and Katrina 
January 19, 2015 

CHEMTRAILS: “WHO” In The World is Spraying 
Now Revealed 
January 16, 2015 

2015 Video Explores Chemtrails and Chemwebs 
January 15, 2015 

George Bush Pedophile Sex Ring and Blackmail 
of Congress 
January 13, 2015 

Sandy Hook Lies Exposed in New Book: 
“MAKING a KILLING” 

January 11,2015 

IPCC Exposed As Elitist Crime Syndicate of 
Payoffs and Extortion 
January 11,2015 

Oregon News Publishes Chemtrails Protest 
Article by Lana Givant 
January 11,2015 

Chemtrails - Researchers Find Nanoparticles 
Could Cause Brain and Heart Disease 
January 10, 2015 

CIA Torture Report Ties Cheney to 9/11 Nukes 
January 10, 2015 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 2 / 23 







































Timeline For Deliberate Warming of the Arctic 

1870: Standard Oil Corp. Inspired Proposals to 
Geoengineer a Warmer Arctic - Standard Oil Co. Inc. was 
an American oil producing, transporting, refining, and marketing 
company. Established in 1870 as a corporation in Ohio, it was the 
largest oil refiner in the world. Its controversial history as one of 
the world’s first and largest multinational corporations ended in 
1911, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that Standard 
was an illegal monopoly. 

1889: Jules Verne wrote about geoengineering the earth’s 
climate in 1889 in a sequel to “From the Earth to the Moon” called 
“The Purchase Of The North Pole”. Verne writes that the 
Baltimore Gun Club purchased large tracts of the Arctic then used 
the famous canon from the earth-to-the-moon to tilt the Earth’s 
axis. The goal was to establish a tropical paradise as a profitable 
tourist attraction at the North Pole while “improving” the entire 
global climate. 

If Verne predicted that man would travel from the earth to the 
moon, it should be no surprise that he also predicted that a small 
group of influential men would consider warming the climate for 
profit. 

1877: Verne could have been inspired by Harvard geologist 
Nathaniel Shaler who proposed diverting warm Atlantic water 
into the Arctic back in 1877 - a dozen years before Verne’s 
“fantastic”story was published and seven years after the 
formation of Standard Oil. 


Warming the Arctic with large-scale 
Geoengineering projects has been the vision 

of industrialists for 100 years - and still is 


Arctic detonation of 88 atmospheric, 29 underground, and 3 
underwater nuclear devices from 1955 to 1990 

Uploaded on Friday 17 Feb 2012 by GRID-Arendal - Nuclear activities 
in the Arctic over the last 50 years 

From collection: Vital Arctic Graphics (2004 edition) 

Author: Philippe Rekacewicz, UNEP/GRID-Arendal 

Numerous nuclear explosions have taken place in the Arctic. One of 
the largest military nuclear testing facilities is on the island of Novaya 
Zemlya, where from 1955 through to 1990 the Soviet Union 
detonated 88 atmospheric, 29 underground, and 3 
underwater nuclear devices. Dozens of civilian ‘peaceful nuclear 
explosions’ have also occured in the Russian Arctic, where nuclear 
bombs were used into the late 1980’s for seismic studies, mining, and in 
attempts to extinguish oil-field fires. (Source) 


NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES IN THE ARCTIC OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS 

*i£uTrnt TT 

■SLAVES 

Ur 

Ur 

l!fc 

u 

y 


****** b ™ 



■fetowtriFc 

CNHH 


** m 

* * 

** A 

+ * * '*• 

fiflMlUlfl 


★ ★ 

* * 

* ★ 

**+ _ * 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 3 / 23 







Miliary nudew Eipknion 
* CMafl iiuoefli «!ploei«i 



LJ 



bel>.hu9 

' u liKHupjr 



mw wixi is! ^ 19912001 **3 

1010 C-TF>f -KlJ U+iJIW. 19W 


¥ hOt±a (Kwwifrfartt 


In 2008 - a year before low solar activity 

began to threaten 40 to 60 years of global 
cooling, the covert aerosol climate engineers 
were confident they could achieve a big arctic 
thaw for BIG OIL, a carbon tax and the 
politics of a United Nations led New World 
Order Bankster economy. 

World Watch Institute: March, 2008: Arctic 
Melting May Lead To Expanded Oil Drilling 


More than half of the Arctic Ocean was covered in year-round ice 
in the mid-1980s. Today, the ice cap is much smaller. Alarming 
evidence of this warming trend was released last week when the 
U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
released satellite evidence that perennial Arctic ice cover, as of 
February, rests on less than 30 percent of the ocean. 

“The rate of sea-ice loss we’re observing is much worse than even the 
most pessimistic projections led us to believe,” says Carroll Muffett, 
deputy campaigns director with Greenpeace USA. For the first time in 
recorded history, this past summer the entire Northwest Passage 
between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans was ice-free, according to 
scientists. (Source) 


Remember when People Thought Arctic 
Warming was a Good Idea? 


VILLAGE VOICE: “ Hey, remember when climate change was 
a swell idea? Coconuts were in the offing.” 

“Imaginations ran wild, and The Washington Post envisioned 
Manhattan becoming a tropical paradise”... “People would be 
gathering oranges off the trees in Central Park, or picking cocoanuts 
from palms along the Battery, [and] hunting crocodiles off the Statue 
of Liberty.” 

The prospect sounded so splendid to New Yorkers that Senator William 
Colder (1917-1923) tried to get $100,000 appropriated for a study of 
the idea. villa 9 eVoice 


Remember when Scientists Thought Arctic 
Warming was a Good Idea? 


1962 Harry Wexler (March 15,1911-1962) was an MIT graduate and 
PhD in meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link connecting 
chlorine and bromine compounds to the destruction of the 

stratospheric ozone layers , but died of a heart attack while on 
vacation in Woods Hole, Mass. Wexler had already accepted an 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 4/23 











invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “The Climate of Earth and Its 
Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and 
Technology Institute. ( Source ) 

Wexler’s was last in a long line of ambitious proposals to warm the 
Arctic. Coincidently, his proposals were made at the same time the 
National Academy of Sciences was working to create a national 
weather modification program - a direction in which the military 
had already embarked in 1958. 

“Global Warming” initiatives proposed by Wexler: 

• To increase the global temperature of the Earth by i.7°C, “by 
injecting a cloud of ice crystals into the polar atmosphere by 
detonating 10 H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean - the subject 
of his 1958 article in Science magazine” (Wexler H., 1958, 
“Modifying Weather on a Large Scale,” Science, n.s. 128 (Oct. 

31,1958): 1059-1063). 

• To diminish the global temperature by i.2°C could be doable, 

“by launching a ring of dust particles into equatorial 
orbit, a modification of an earlier Russian proposal to warm 
the Arctic”. 

• To destroy the ozone layer and hence increase abruptly 
the surface temperature of the Earth, by spraying “several 
hundred thousand tons of chlorine or bromine” with a 
stratospheric airplane. Fleming, 2007(a), pp. 56-57; 

Fleming, 2007(b), “note n° viii” p. 9 & p. 5 ( source ) 

The decision to reverse direction from warming the arctic to cooling the 
arctic was announced in 1963 - the year following Wexler’s death 
when the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Atmospheric 
Sciences recommended appointment of a Panel on Weather & Climate 
Modification. 

Prevailing Circumstances following WWII: 

• Operation Paperclip (Also called Operation Overcast) 
succeeded in recruiting scientists from Nazi Germany for 
employment in the US after WWII and led to the formation 
of NASA and the ICBM program. 

• The National Security Act passed in 1947 made possible the 
rise of the military industrial complex and creation of the 
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ) to increase opportunities 
for scientific experiments to be conducted without public 
knowledge or Congressional oversight. 

• Post-war advances in science and advanced physics opened up 
opportunities to develop concepts of advanced thinkers like 
Nikola Tesla that had been waiting on the shelf for over 50 
years. 

• In 1958, military application of Tesla’s little known methods of 
electromagnetic manipulation of earth’s atmosphere was 
already underway. White House advisor on weather 
modification to President Eisenhower reported the DoD was 
studying ways to manipulate electrical charges of the earth 
and sky in order to manipulate the weather for purposes of 
national defense. 

• The rise of an informed and educated middle class looked 
down on proposals that employed nuclear detonations that 
became regarded as dangerous and arrogant. This is not to 
sau that vroyosals to mediate the arctic climate were totally 

abandoned. 


If warming the arctic was regarded as good 
for commerce for 100 years why would a 
discovery that found carbon dioxide was 
already performing the task for free, 
suddenly be regarded as a climate 
catastrophe tone prevented at all costs (to 
carbon taxpayers)? 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 5 / 23 











The BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico 
demonstrates how Big Oil exists in a 
world of opportunistic pragmatism, no 
matter the risk to the environment. With 
an established record of corporate 
sociopathy, Big Oil would have little 
interest in what event would cause arctic 
ice to retreat as long as their long-held 
dream of new arctic navigation routes 
and access to previously ice-locked oil and gas reserves was realized. It 
could make marginal difference if the arctic temperatures rise due to 
(l) rising CO2 levels or (2) covert arctic climate manipulation. 

This timeline of determined Geoengineering projects suggests 
the goal of mediating arctic climate remains a favorite goal of 
the fossil fuel industry. 

1877 Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed channeling more 
of the warm Kuroshio Current through the Bering Strait to raise 
temperatures in the Polar region by 30 degrees. 

1912, New York Engineer and Industrialist, Carroll Livingston 
Riker proposed building a 200 mile jetty off Newfoundland to increase 
the Gulf Stream’s flow into to the Arctic Basin with the added benefit 
that it would “shift” the axis of planet earth. The New York Times 

characterized the proposal as “amazing”... but not insane. 

1929: Hermann Oberth , German-Hungarian physicist and 
engineer; Proposed building giant mirrors on a space station to focus 
the Sun’s radiation on Earth’s surface, making the far North habitable 
and freeing sea lanes to Siberian harbors. 

1945; Julian Huxley, biologist and Secretary-General of UNESCO 
1946-48; Proposed exploding atomic bombs at an appropriate height 
above the polar regions to raise the temperature of the Arctic Ocean 
and warm the entire climate of the northern temperate zone. 

1946 Village Voice article from 2005 reporting on theMay, 1946 issue 
of Mechanix Illustrated that featured several arctic-warming 
geoengineering proposals. One “brave new idea” was proposed by 
Julian Huxley, then the Secretary-General of UNESCO, and brother of 
Aldous Huxley, that would detonate atomic bombs to warm the Arctic. 

1958; M. Gorodsky , Soviet engineer and mathematician, and 
Valentin Cherenkov, Soviet meteorologist; Proposed placing a ring of 
metallic potassium particles into Earth’s polar orbit to diffuse light 
reaching Earth and increase solar radiation to thaw the permanently 
frozen soil of Russia, Canada, and Alaska and melt polar ice. 

1958; Arkady Markin , Soviet engineer; Proposed that the United 
States and Soviet Union build a gigantic dam across the Bering Strait 
and use nuclear power-driven propeller pumps to push the warm 
Pacific current into the Atlantic by way of the Arctic Sea. Arctic ice 
would melt, and the Siberian and North American frozen areas would 
become temperate and productive. 

1958 Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s proposed melting the 
Arctic and Greenland icecaps by spreading black coal dust on the ice, 
creating cloud-cover across the poles to trap heat and to divert warm 
Atlantic waters into the polar regions. This scheme was taken seriously 
by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held in Leningrad in the 
early 1960's following an initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium 
of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959. 

1958 Atlantic Richfield geologist L.M. Natland, proposed exploding 

up to 100 underground nuclear bombs to mine the Alberta Oil 

Sands. Heat from the detonations was expected to boil the bitumen 
deposits, reducing their viscosity to the point that standard drilling 
operations could be used. The plan was encouraged by US efforts to 
find “peaceful uses” for atomic energy. The project was approved in 

1959 but the Canadian government reversed their decision in 1962 and 
declared that Canada was opposed to all forms of nuclear testing. In 



Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 6 / 23 






2012 the Canadian Tar Sands are, again an issue of international 
concern. 

1962 Harry Wexler (March 15,1911-1962) was an MIT graduate and 
PhD in meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link connecting 
chlorine and bromine compounds to the destruction of the 

stratospheric ozone layers , but died of a heart attack while on 
vacation in Woods Hole, Mass. Wexler had already accepted an 
invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “The Climate of Earth and Its 
Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and 
Technology Institute. ( Source ) 


It remains largely unexplained why decades of optimism for 
warming the arctic was suddenly replaced with a campaign of 
fear and doom for the consequences of warming the arctic 
under the name of “Global Warming”, then “climate change”, 
as the efforts to engineer warming failed. 


In the 1960’s Geoengineering proposals to warm 
the Arctic took a largely unexplained U-turn when 
oceanographer, Roger Revelle’ s research 
concluded that carbon dioxide was already 
warming the climate for free and without the need 
for expensive and risky geoengineering projects. 

This U-Turn of direction appeared to be a setback 
with the exception of those stakeholders in the 
energy sector who had been invested in arctic warming projects for 
decades. Did the CO2 story finally promise to give Exxon, BP and Shell 
what they wanted? 

If the science of Roger Revelle’s forecast for global warming turned out 
to be wrong or too slow, the DoD could step in - for reasons of 

national security - to assist arctic warming as secret component of the 
military’s classified weather modification and weapons program. 

The 1996 Air Force document that forecasts “ Owning the Weather in 
2025” would not rule out using Tesla and plasma technologies to 
increase arctic temperatures in order to disadvantage a perceived 
enemy. A decision not to intervene might betray the military’s primary 
objective of “Full Spectrum Dominance”. After all, access to Oil and 
Gas has been a national security priority for decades. 

In 1966, Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Chairman of the ICAS 
Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification and wrote: 

“Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the 
industrial revolution has produced an increase in the average 
temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree 
Fahrenheit.” Gordon MacDonald “Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck 
the Environment. Source 

MacDonald was referring to Roger Revelle and Hans Suess paper that 
reversed the debate from how to warm the arctic to how to avoid 
warming the arctic. Revelle’s ocean research reported a rise in carbon 
dioxide in earth’s atmosphere was allegedly a result of industrial age 
manufacturing and coal-burning. Source 

Revelle had worked with the Navy in the late 1940’s to determine 
which projects gained funding and successfully promoted the idea that 
the Navy should invest more in “basic research”. Revelle was deeply 
involved in the global growth of oceanography. He was also one of the 
committee chairmen in the influential National Academy of 
Sciences studies of the “Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation” 
(BEAR), 1954-1964. Revelle’s world influence was significant as 
president of the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, an 
international group of scientists devoted to advising on international 
projects. Revelle and other scientists at Scripps Institution of 



Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 7 / 23 







Oceanography helped the U.S. government to plan nuclear weapons 
tests so that oceanographers might make use of the data. Source 

The conclusions of the BEAR report were understandably significant 
for demonstrating the harmful biological and environmental damage 
of atomic radiation and could easily suffice to thwart geoengineering 
projects that recommended detonating H-bombs. But the evidence is 
weak that all intentions to mediate arctic climate was totally 
abandoned. 

If the fundamental goal to warm the arctic remains an unspoken 
priority of national security in the energy sector, the project could be 
taken out of public view and committee oversight to become a 
classified operation in the development of the military’s weather 
warfare program - an initiative that was acknowledged by civilian 
weather modification programs formalized by the 1966 NASA and 
ICAS charter. 


Since 1958 Congress and the military had 
already been working on exotic weather 
warfare systems that involved 
electromagnetic manipulation of the 
ionosphere. 


US Congress, Senate, Committee on Inter-State and Foreign 
Commerce, Weather Modification Research, Hearing, Washington 
D.C. US Govt. Printing Office, March 18-19,1958; Lowell Ponte quotes 
Capt. Orville as reporting “that the Dept, of Defense was studying 
ways to manipulate the charges of earth and sky and so affect the 
weather by means of an electronic beams to ionize or de-ionize the 
atmosphere over a given area ”.... Capt. Orville also discussed ongoing 
US Air Force experiments with ‘ sodium vapor , ejected from jet planes 
to intercept solar radiation ‘ over enemy countries and rain their _ 

weather. (The Cooling , ov. cit. vv. 168-169 Source P. 42 

The flip-flop from finding ways to warm the arctic to suddenly finding 
ways to keep the arctic from warming was announced in 1963 - the 
year following the sudden death of Meteorologist, Harry Wexler. 

Having total awareness of the military’s 1958 weather weapons 
program, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommended the 
appointment of a “Panel on Weather and Climate Modification”. source 
This event could serve to consolidate military and civilian weather 
modification programs for peaceful purposes or - if necessary - as 

covert weather modification and even climate warming operations 
secretly carried out by the military under the catch-all justification of 
“national security”. 

FOLLOW THE MONEY: Lobbyists for Big Oil publicly claim Global 
Warming is a hoax while quietly investing billions in new drilling 
opportunities due to the reality of receding arctic ice. The energy sector 
has made huge investments in ice-breakers and drilling equipment to 
profit from the very global warming they are reluctant to acknowledge. 
The position of having your cake while eating it is essential. When 
arctic climate warming is revealed as a military climate modification 
operation, big oil can fall back on “we told you so”. Since governments 
may come and go over the next 100 years, they calculate the demand 
for oil - and the companies who drill for it - will remain intact. 

• “As the polar ice cap retreats, energy companies are looking 
north for a potentially huge new source of crude” Source 

• “Shell is one of six companies planning to extract oil, gas and 
minerals in the Arctic as global warming melts ice and opens 
new sea lanes to commerce.” Source 

• “Remote and dangerous sources of arctic oil are becoming 
increasingly attractive as the global need for oil grows and the 
existing reserves dry up.” Source 



Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 8 / 23 











Documents from 1966 reveal how the 
military and federal agencies are modifying 
the global climate. 


TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal 
Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” 

This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of government 
agencies in perpetual and secret collaboration , working with the 
military to Geoengineer the climate. Created as an agenda of the elitist 
National Academy of Sciences - decades of an inter-agency culture 
of secrecy explains why the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a 
taboo topic to be degraded to the status of “conspiracy theory” by every 
government agency in this web of complicit bureaucrats at every 
opportunity. This is why your local TV “meteorologist” will rarely make 
a helpful comment about an unusual sky filled with persistent jet trails. 

• 1966, JUN: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in 
Weather-Climate Modification” Prepared by the ICAS select 
Panel on Weather Modification 

• 1966: NOV: A Recommended National Program in Weather 
Modification - A Report to the Interdepartmental Committee 
for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell - 
Associate Administrator for Space Science and Applications, 
NASA, Washington, D.C. 

• 1966: APPENDIX I - Panel on Weather and Climate 
Modification to Committee on Atmospheric Sciences NAS- 
NRC - Membership Recommendations 

• 1966: APPENDIX II - Special Commission on Weather 
Modification - National Science Foundation Membership 
Recommendations. 

• 1966: APPENDIX III Report prepared by the ICAS Select 
Panel on Weather Modification; “Present and Future Plans of 
Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification,” dated 
June 20,1966 

• 1966: APPENDIX IV Memorandum for Dr. Homer E. 

Newell from J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman, ICAS, Subject: 
National Weather Modification Program, dated June 21,1966 

• 1966: APPENDIX V NASA Panel to Study Weather 
Modification Activities; Membership, Chronology of Meetings, 
and a Compilation of Supporting Material used by the Panel 

• 1966: APPENDIX VI Budget Recommendations and Trends 
for a National Weather Modification Program 

1966 - NASA: A Recommended National Program in Weather 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 9/23 









Modification - A report to the Independent Committee for 
Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell - Associate 
administrator for Space Science and Applications, NASA, 
Washington, DC. 

In 1966, a report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Committee for 
Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, NAS ) was 
the first step in establishing a national Weather modification program 
that would ultimately involve multiple federal agencies. The report 
focused on four initial agencies: ESSA, NSF, NASA, and the Dept, of 
Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation. 

Under Recommended Principals it was noted that (a) each agency 
would be independently funded while stressing inter-agency 
cooperation in research. Independent funding of agencies could make 
the program less conspicuous and more difficult for Congress to 
defund. Also, new agencies could be brought on board without high 
profile budget hearings, (b) A designated “central” agency - while 
having responsibility for focusing the national program - would not 
have any real authority to implement programs, leaving those 
decisions to probable unidentified civilian lobbyists and DoD 
“stakeholders”. 

Although the theme of the ICAS report is in the context of protecting 
water, agriculture, forests, lands and natural resources, the knowledge 
gained from climate manipulation was of more immediate interest to 
the military and their industrial complex. 

Thirty years following the creation of the Nation Program in Weather 
Modification, the US Air Force published a document (“Owning The 
Weather in 2025 ” ) establishing that federal agencies involved in the 
National Weather Modification program are under tacit authority of 
the Department of Defense. 

Owning the Weather in 2025 - Opening Statement : Current 
technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone 
who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather 
patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. 
Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create 
global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries 
or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability. 

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of 
national security policy with both domestic and international 
applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on 
its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral 
actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, 
membership in an international organization such as the UN, or 
participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national 
security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national 
military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits 
an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue 
weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries. 

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather- 
modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never 
before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and 
space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and 
battlespace awareness.i “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull 
it all tog ether; ”2 in 2025 we can “Own the Weather 


Case Study 2 

A 1986 Critique of the 1966 National Weather 
Modification Initiative 

The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D 
program Into a Military Weapons System 



Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 10 / 23 







CASE STUDY Document located on the website of the 
Federation of American Scientists - Click Here 


Case Study 2: “The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D 
program Into a Military Weapons System” 

This Federation of American Scientists document is intended as a 
critique of the US Weather Modification Program that characterizes as 
hijacked into a military weapons system. 

For over 100 years, experts and authors were advocating 
geoengineering projects warm the arctic. The public, at large, was 
entertained by these concepts even when suggestions to detonate 
hydrogen bombs over the north pole were advocated by a nationally 
recognized weather expert in 1962. 

It’s revealing that initial proposals to solve the newly discovered CO2 
“warming” problem had less to do with cutting back on carbon 
emissions and more to do with a rush to release toxic atmospheric 
aerosols without first, researching the hazards. The specter of polluting 
the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and causing the release of huge 
volumes of CO2 from the jet aircraft aerosol sorties is an obvious public 
health concern that requires years of research the government was 
unwilling to legislate and fund. Therefore, the impatience with which 
these chemical aerosol schemes have been promoted suggests that 
emergency steps to cool the planet with aerosols has long been 
regarded as a tantalizing primary mission. 


In 1962, Geoenginnering efforts to warm the 
arctic were widely entertained but in 1966 it 
was top priority to prevent the arctic from 
warming by even one degree. 


Trojan Horse?: Under the military’s 
vision to Own the Weather Weather in 
2025 atmospheric warming with 
ionospheric and plasma weapons is an 
established capability. The numerous 
agencies inside the National Weather and 
Climate Modification program are actively 
guarding the military’s aerosol and energy 
weapons program with stiff denials to the 
public and media whenever the issue of 
“chemtrails” is a story on local radio or TV stations. 

It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause 
for climate change but refuse to acknowledge the military has been 
actively engaged in climate modification since the mid 1990’s? 

An abrupt reversal of policy from promoting 
arctic climate mediation to preventing Global 
Warming resulted in ideas that both polluted 
the atmosphere AND became a source of 
G lobal Warming. 

Just as the ICAS/NASA National Weather Modification program is 
being formalized the record shows most ideas to cool the planet 
suddenly involve bazaar schemes to spray or disburse particles, biology 
and dust into the atmosphere and oceans. These are the same people 
who - just a few months earlier, were eagerly lining up to hear Wexler 
talk about ways to warm the planet with hydrogen bombs, destruction 
of the OZONE and orbital particles. 

While most of us realize that many of these proposals from respected 



Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 11/23 














experts would be catastrophic to the environment, not all of these 
draconian ideas have been rejected, even as increasing evidence 
determines that deploying chemicals into the atmosphere does more 
harm than good. 

Deployment of geoengineering aerosols as observed in practice for two 
decades is now regarded as a source of global warming - not a 
fix.: 


Geoengineering Aerosols Are Warming the 
Atmosphere ana Are a Source of Global 
Warming 


0 In 1999, Climate Scientist, Joyce Penner published a study that 
determined Jet Aircraft Contrails and high Cirrus clouds 
produce a net warming of surface temperatures. Dr. Penner’s 
status as a climate scientist on the UN International Panel on 
Climate Change implies a consensus on the issue of contrails and high 
thin couds warming the atmosphere to affect climate change. (Article) 

\ In 2007, investigator, Cliff Carnicom calculated the impact 
b" i of the current unacknowledged aerosol deployment into the 
atmosphere and concludes: 

“It can be seen from this model that the results of artificial aerosol 
introduction into the lower atmosphere can be of a magnitude quite on 
par with the extraordinary impacts projected by even modest and 
conservative global warming models upon humans in the near future. 
As the model presented herein is intended to be reasonably 
conservative, the impact of the aerosol operations could be much 
greater than these results show. It is advised that the citizens consider 
the viability and merit of this model in the examination of the global 
warming issue, and that they openly take aggressive action to halt the 
intentional aerosol operations. 

This paper is late in its offering, as my availability for continued 
research at this level is limited. I am nevertheless hopeful that the 
information can be evaluated and assimilated into the many rationales 
and arguments that have developed over the last decade to cease the 
intentional alteration of the atmosphere of our planet.” - Cliff 
Carnicom Com P letestud y 


Geoengineering Proposals to Warm the Arctic 
Are Replaced by Fear of G lobal Warming 


• 1965; President’s Science Advisory Committee, United States; 
Proposal: Investigated injecting condensation or freezing 
nuclei into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of 
increasing carbon dioxide. 

• 1977; Cesare Marchetti, Italian industrial physicist; Coined 
the term “geoengineering” and proposed sequestering CO2 in 
the deep ocean. 

• 1983; Stanford Penner, A. M. Schneider, and E. M. Kennedy, 
American physicists; Suggested introducing small particles into 
the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space. 

• 1988; John H. Martin, American oceanographer; Proposed 
dispersing a relatively small amount of iron into appropriate 
areas of the ocean to create large algae blooms that could take 
in enough atmospheric carbon to reverse the greenhouse effect 
and cool Earth. 

• 1989; James T. Early, American climatologist suggested 
deflecting sunlight by 2 percent with a $1 trillion to $10 trillion 
“space shade” placed in Earth orbit. 

• 1990; John Latham, British cloud physicist; Proposed seeding 
marine stratocumulus clouds with seawater droplets to 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 12 / 23 












increase their reflectivity and longevity. 

• 1992; NAS Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public 
Policy proposed adding more dust to naturally occurring 
stratospheric dust to increase the net reflection of sunlight. 

• 1998: International Space Station (ISS): The first 

modular component of the International Space Station (ISS) 
was launched and is the current (in 2012) habitable artificial 
satellite in low Earth orbit following the Salyut, Almaz, Skylab 
and Mir. (1998 ISS mission consistent with same year increase 
in jet aerosol public observations and complaints) The stated 
function of the SSI is to provide an international space 
platform for research and experimentation in the fields of 
biology, human biology, physics, astronomy, meteorology 
(weather) and other fields. 

• 2010: Geoengineer, David Keith (AAAS Meeting) proposal to 
use jet aircraft to spray Sulfur dioxide and aluminum nano¬ 
particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into 
space. 


In 1968, Gordon J. F. MacDonald authored 
a chapter in “ Unless Peace Comes “ where he 
correctly predicted that future means of 
obtaining national objectives by force hinges on 
man’s ability to control and manipulate the 
environment of planet Earth. 

“When achieved, this power over his 
environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great 
and indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of 
deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world 
in which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one 
in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons 
of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe. As I 
will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret 
wars.” 

(( To consider the consequences of environmental modification in 
struggles among nations, we need to consider the present state of the 
subject and how postulated developments in the field could lead, ten to 
fifty years from now, to weapons systems that would use nature in 
new and perhaps unexpected ways. “ 

More Than Owning the Weather in 2025 

The confidence and enthusiasm expressed in the 
USAF 1996 document: Owning the Weather in 
2025 was supported by the advent of scalar 
weapons technologies during the Reagan Star War 
years. The document promises: “ weather- 

modification can provide battlespace dominance 
to a degree never before imagined. The “never 
before imagined” comment speaks directly to the 
HAARP ionospheric heater facility, the Bernard 
Eastlund patents and military strategies for global 
military dominance. This scenario of weather control harkens to the 
predictive warning from Gordon MacDonald in chapter in the book: 
Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the Environment. Source 

Timeline for Owning the Weather: From 1987-1992 ATPI 

scientists build on Bernard Eastlund’s patents for development of new 
weapon capabilities 

In 1994 ATPI is bought by E-Systems with a contract to build the 
biggest ionospheric heater in the world (HAARP). — In 1995, Raytheon 
bought E-Systems and old APTI patents. — In 1996 the Air Force 
publishes: Owning The Weather in 2025 

In his 2011 book, Here on Earth : A Natural 
History of the Planet , scientist and author, 
Tim Flannery reminds us that proposals to melt 
the Icecaps were advanced after World War II by 
reputable figures including the first director- 
general of UNESCO (Julian Huxley-1946), by a 





Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 13 / 23 



















top official at the U.S. Weather Bureau, and by a 
Russian oil engineer Petr Mikhailovich 

Borisov. Scientific conferences debated the 


Jam Flannery 


merits, while mining and energy corporations contemplated the use of 
nuclear detonations in the extraction of coal and oil. 

Reputable figures in the international community saw an opportunity 
to detonate nuclear weapons as a novel and constructive way to 
geoengineer the Arctic. The prevailing rationale to justify method 
included: (l) The arctic is nearly too cold to be habitable by humans (2) 
The polar ice cap blocks valuable shipping lanes. (3) The expanses of 
frigid water up North contributes to uncomfortably cold winters in 
many countries. (4) difficulty of drilling for oil through ice. 

The idea was publicly floated as a “peaceful use” of atomic weapons. 

Flannery offers this example as evidence of humanity’s seeming 
propensity for hastening its own extinction. 

Here on Earth : A Natural History of the Planet - By Tim 

Flannery. Book Review^ jy[ ar k Engler 

Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s Proposed Method of 
Melting the Arctic Icecap 

Borisov’s idea: If the Arctic ice is once melted much less of the sun’s 
radiation will be reflected out into space and therefore the arctic ice 
cap will not re-form. An ice-free Arctic Ocean would be a great boon 
to oceanic shipping , especially between Europe and East Asia. Much 
land in northern Canada and Siberia would be freed of permafrost and 
made suitable for agriculture. Borisov believed that an ice-free Arctic 
Ocean would lead to increased evaporation of water and hence 
increased rainfall worldwide, including the region of Sahara Desert 
leading to grass growing there. Borisov considers all of the impacts of 
the melting of the Arctic ice cap to be beneficial. He asserts that the 
melting of the Greenland ice cap would raise sea levels at a rate of only 
1.5 to 2 mm per year. 

This scheme was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two 
conferences were held in Leningrad in the early 1960's following an 
initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of 
Sciences in 1959. Borisov’s suggestions to warm the arctic 
included: 

• Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such 
as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959) (Carbon Black?) 

• Dispersing the cloud cover over the central Arctic Basin (D. 
Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols?) 

• Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963) 

• Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. 
Budyko, 1962) 

• Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea 
(V.P. P’yankov, 1965) 

• Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm 
Atlantic water into the Arctic Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968) 

This concept also required construction of a dam across the Bering 
Strait. Source: P.M. Borisov , “ Can we Control the Arctic 

Climate?”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , March, 1969 , pp. 43-48. 

In a related scheme, a proposal was floated to store nuclear waste in 
the Antarctic. The plan would allow specially designed canisters of 
hot radioactive waste to melt down through the ice until it reached the 
“ice-rock interface” where it would supposedly remain in cold storage 
for 250,000 years. 

The following Timeline is from the book, “Angels Don’t Play 
This HAARP” Advances in Tesla Technology by Jeanne Manning and 
Dr. Nick Begich and contains disturbing facts about the little known 
history of our Government’s use of scalar technologies to modify the 
weather. Additional events and links were inserted in 2012 to update 
the list. 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 14 / 23 









Timeline of public and covert testing and development of 
energy weapons 

• 1886-8: Nikola Tesla invents system of Alternating Current 
power source and transmission system. As 60-pulse-per- 
second (hertz) AC power grids spread over the land, Earth’s 
resonance frequency will eventually dance to a different beat 
than her usual 7-8 hertz . 

• 1900: Tesla applies for patent for a device to transmit 
Electrical Energy “Through the Natural Mediums”. U.S. 

Patent #787,412 issued in 1905 

• 1924: Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ionosphere 
(electrically-charged layer starting at altitude of 50 
kilometers). 

• 1938: Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron 
gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter. 

• 1940: Tesla announces “death ray” invention. 

• 1945: Atomic bomb tests begin 40,000 electromagnetic pulses 
to follow. 

• 1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 hertz resonant frequency 
of the earth. 

• 1958: Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged 
particles trapped in earth’s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. 

VA Belt violently disrupted with nuclear detonations 

• 1958: Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes 3 nuclear bombs in 
Van Allen belt. 

• 1958: As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on 
weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the 
DoD was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the 
Earth and sky and so affect the weather by using an electronic 
beam to ionise or de-ionise the atmosphere over a given area. 

• i960: Series of weather disasters begin. 

• 1961 - Project Skywater - Bureau of Reclamation (water) 
cloud seeding project funded by Congress. 

• 1961: Copper needles dumped into ionosphere as 
“telecommunications shield”. 

• 1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 
1960's the dumping of chemicals (barium powder etc.) from 
satellites/rockets began. 

• 1961-62: Soviets and USA blast many EMPs in atmosphere, 
300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer estimated 
at 4%. 

• 1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating 
plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma. 

• 1966, June, Report to ICAS by ICAS Select Panel - Chair, 
Gordon JF MacDonald. “Future plans of Federal Agencies in 
Weather and Climate Modification.” 

• 1966, Nov, report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Comm, 
for Atmospheric Sciences of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, 
NAS) was first step in establishing a National Weather 
Modification program 

• 1966: Gordon J. F . MacDonald publishes military ideas on 
environmental engineering. MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS 
Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification. 

• 1960's: In Wisconsin, US Navy Project Sanguine lays ELF 
antennae. 

• 1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that Soviets pinpointed 
which pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and 
physiological functions and which do harm. 

• 1968: Gordon JF MacDonald authors chapter in book: 
“Unless peace Comes - a scientific forecast of new weapons” 
MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather 
and Climate Modification. 

• 1969: Hail Suppression Data from Western North Dakota, 
1969-1972 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 
Rapid City. 

• 1972: First reports on “ionospheric heater” experiments with 
high frequency radio waves, at Arecibo. 100-megawatt heater 
in Norway built later in decade; can change conductivity of 
auroral ionosphere. 

• 1972: Potential Value of Satellite Cloud Pictures in Weather 
Mod. Projects - Report prepared for NASA by Institute of 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 15 / 23 





Atmospheric Sciences South Dakota School of Mines and 
Technology Rapid City. 

• 1973: Documentation that launch of Skylab and associated 
rocket exhaust gases ' ’halved the total electron content of the 
ionosphere for three hours. 

• 1973: Recommendations for study of Project Sanguine’s 
biological effects denied by Navy. 

• 1974: United Nations General Assembly bans environmental 
warfare. ENMOD 

• 1974: High-frequency experiments at Plattesville, Colorado; 
Arecibo, Puerto Rico; and, Armidale, New South Wales heat 
“bottom side of ionosphere”. 

• 1974: Experiments airglow brightened by hitting oxygen 
atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons. 

• 1975: Evaluation of Monte Carlo Tests of Effectiveness of 
Cloud Seeding on Growing Season Rainfall in North Dakota. 

• 1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that VLF 
from power lines is altering the ionosphere. 

• 1975: U. S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces Navy to release 
research showing that ELF transmissions can alter human 
blood chemistry. 

• 1975: Pell Senate Subcommittee urges that weather and 
climate modification work be overseen by civilian agency 
answerable to U.S. Congress. No action taken. 

• 1975: Soviets begin pulsing “Woodpecker” ELF waves, at key 
brainwave rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, one of locations where 
people were particularly affected. 

• 1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show nerve cells 
affected by ELF fields. 

• 1977: Environmental Impacts of Precipitation Management - 
Inferences to Project Skywater 

• 1979: Launch of NASA’s third High-Energy Astrophysical 
Observatory causes large-scale, artificially-induced depletion 
in the ionosphere. Plasma hole caused by “rapid chemical 
processes” between rocket exhaust and ozone layer.” 
...“ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal 
distance of 300 km for some hours.” 

• 1979: Annotated Bibliography of Predictor Variables for 
Weather Modification Applications - Funded by NSF Grant 
ATM 79-05007pub., Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana. 

• 1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent “Method and 
Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, 
ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,” (First of 3 Eastlund 
patents assigned to ARCO Power Technologies Inc.) 

• 1986: US Navy Project Henhouse duplicates Delgado (Madrid) 
experiment — very low-level, very-low-frequency pulsed 
magnetic fields harm chick embryos. 20 

• 1987: In the later part of the decade the U.S. begins network 
of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each 
to generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves for defense 
purposes. 

• 1987-92: Other APTI scientists build on Eastlund patents for 
development of new weapon capabilities. 

• 1994: Military contractor E-Systems buys APTI, holder of 
Eastlund patents and contract to build biggest ionospheric 
heater in world (HAARP). 

• 1994: Congress freezes funding on HAARP until planners 
increase emphasis on earth-penetrating tomography uses, for 
nuclear counter proliferation efforts. (Oil and gas exploration) 

• 1 995 -1 997 ‘ Public complaints accumulate across the US 
regarding unusual cloud formations and sudden increase in 
observable persistent jet contrails that appear unnaturally 
under dry atmospheric conditions. These observations are 
accompanied by complaints of biological specimens and web 
formations that appear to fall from the sky. Many instances of 
qualified lab analysis reveal high concentration of aluminum, 
barium and other elements that are consistent with DoD 
electromagnetic experiments 

• * 995 : Raytheon buys E-Systems and old APTI patents. The 
technology is now hidden among thousands of patents within 
one of the largest defense contractor portfolios. 

• 1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996 under “nuclear 
counterproliferation” efforts for HAARP project. 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 16 / 23 





• 1995 - Test of patent number 5,041,834 to generate an Artificial 
Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), or a plasma layer in the 
atmosphere. The AIM is used like the ionosphere to reflect RF 
energy over great distances. 

• 1994-6: Testing of first-stage HAARP (euphemistically named 
High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) equipment 
continues, although funding was frozen. 

• 1996: HAARP scientists test the earth-penetrating tomography 
applications by modulating the electroject at Extremely Low 
Frequencies (ELF) 

• 1998: Projected date for fully-operating HAARP system. 

• 2009: Operation HAMP - Department of Homeland Security 
operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with 
Geoengineering Aerosols 

• 2012: Celebrating 50 years of Success. A Compilation of 
highlights from the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences at South 
Dakota School of Mines & Technology Rapid City. 


The World is Waking Up to State Crimes of 
C limate Warming and Violent Weather by 
Combinations of Powerful Electromagnetic 
Energy Weapons and Aerosol Climate Change 
E ngineering 


It was in the mid- 1990’s when the US public a were suddenly 
confronted with unexplained changes in the sky that included bazaar 
new cloud formations and new types of jet contrails that persisted in 
the skies for hours even while the relative humidity was very low at the 
altitudes where the jets were flying. These observed changes were 
coincident with events following the 1994 E-Systems purchase of APTI, 
also holder of plasma physicist, Bernard Eastlund’s patents and 
contracts to build the world’s largest ionospheric heater (HAARP). 

The history of the 1966 National weather Modification Program and 
the coincidence of events around the time of bazaar new cloud 
formations is sufficient reason to pursue the relationship of persistent 
jet aerosols to the ionospheric heater experiments at the HAARP facility 
and Gakona, AK, Aricebo, PR and many more similar facilities brought 
online in recent years. 

The ongoing depletion of earth’s protective OZONE layer is a known 
risk to manipulation of the ionosphere with powerfully heated beams of 
electromagnetic radiation. Pollution from the Shuttle missions, alone 
has accounted for rapid ozone depletion according to NASA’s own 
documents. 

Further damage results when chemical aerosols deployed over either 
polar region traps heat in the troposphere resulting in a rise in surface 
temperatures to endanger normal formation of seasonal ice with an 
associated plunge in stratospheric temperatures into the range of -109 
deg. F. with the formation of chemically contaminated ice crystals that 
react with sunlight to further deplete the OZONE. 

From 2009 to 2012 persistent jet chemical aerosols are clearly observed 
over the North Polar regions on many satellite images and ground- 
based photographs. It is no surprise that NASA now reports new 
OZONE depletion in far northern latitudes where none was previously 
detected. 

It’s no secret that government agencies, the military and commercial 
interests of the US and abroad have invested in a radical scalar system 
of weather modification that is now revealed to have far too many 
unintended negative consequences to sustain life on earth. 

Continuation of this vast and terra-deforming aerosol geoengineering 
operation will only confirm that one agenda is to deplete the arctic ice 
- a concept that has been embraced by influential men, Oil companies 
and nations for nearly 100 years. 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 17 / 23 






The government, military, IPCC, UN and corporate stakeholders can 
no longer pretend to be desperately concerned about global warming 
and climate change while the world is waking up to realize these same 
entities are participating in the deployment of electromagnetic weapons 
and aerosols of massive climate destruction as a monstrous and 
Orwellian hoax on humanity. 

UPDATES 

World Wide Watch Institute, 2014: 

In the seas north of Russia and Alaska, expanded oil-and-gas 
development is already under way. The U.S. Department of 
Interior last month sold a record-breaking $2.6 billion in 
development bids throughout the Chukchi Sea, just above the 
Bering Strait. Additional sales are scheduled for 2010 and 2012. As 
companies move into the Arctic to search for energy reserves or to 
create new shipping lanes, the potential environmental impacts 
could be huge. Balton acknowledged that shifting ice and coastal 
erosion makes exploration and development risky. “It’s definitely a 
dangerous area to maneuver. An oil spill would be really hard to 
clean up,” he said. *** Continue 

Related Links: 

• 2012: Discovery Channel Airs Weather Control, Aerosols and 
Interview with Michael Murphy 

• 2009: Operation HAMP - Department of Homeland Security 
operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with 
Geoengineering Aerosols 

• 1968 - Unless Peace Comes - How to Wreck the 
Environment - Chapter by Gordon J.F. MacDonald 

• 2011 - Here On Earth: A Natural History of the Planet - 
Flannery, 2011 - by Tim Flannery 

• Discovery of Global Warming Roger Revelle - 1957 paper 
started the discussion even while warming the arctic was being 
considered. 

• Coleman’s Corner : John Coleman - Meteorologist and 
original owner of the Weather Channel is an expert on the 
work of Oceanographer, Roger Revelle who - later in life - 
recanted his earlier conclusion that CO2 is a significant global 
warming gas.. 

• Stormy Weather - The Government’s Top-Secret Efforts To 
Control Mother Nature-12-22-2001 by Bob Fitrakis and Fritz 
Chess ColumbusAlive.com 12-22-2001 

• Are Humans doomed to Destroy Themselves? Tim Fannery’s 
book: HERE ON EARTH A natural history of the planet 

• Historical perspective on atmospheric engineering. A 
periodization, Regis Briday PhD Student at Centre Alexandre 
Koyre^ PPT ^ 

• Polar Eclipse; Village Voice article features May 1946 
Mechanix Illustrated “using atomic bombs to warm the 
arctic”. 

• Arctic oil rush: The new global petroleum race will shape 
Alaska’s future. 

• HAARP.net Nick Begich Website - Angels Don’t Play this 
HAARP 

• Global Research: Extensive Archives on Climate Change, 
Weather Modification and Chemtrails 

• HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) 

• HAARP University ( High Frequency Active Auroral Research 
Program). 

• HAARP 101: The World’s Sexiest Energy Weapon 
http://rezn8d.net/2012/01/04/haarp-the-w0rlds-sexiest- 
energy-weapon/ 

• HAARP 201: Timeline: An Animated History of Ionospheric 
Destruction 

http://rezn8d.net/2012/01/20/haarp-timeline-an-animated- 
history-of-ionospheri... 

• HAARP 301: The Sonic Weapon of Vladimir Gavreau — Tesla, 
LRAD, and HAARP 

http:/ / rezn8d.net/ 2012/02/15/the-sonic-weapon-of-vladimir- 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 18/23 




gavreau-tesla-lrad-... 

• HAARP 401: Directed Energy Weapons 101: Infrasonic, Sonic, 
Microwave & Laser 

http://rezn8d.net/2012/02/15/directed-energy-weap0ns-101- 
infrasonic-sonic-mic... 

• HAARP 501: Project Nimbus & The Fire of the Gods 
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/06/haarp-project-nimbus-and- 
the-fire-of-the-gods / 

• HAARP 601: HAARP + DARPA = Team Thunder cats 
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/21/darpa-haarp-team- 
thundercats/ 

• HAARP 701: Resonations from the Moon 
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/27/haarp-resonations-from-the- 
moon/ 

• HAARP 801: Russian President wields Zombie Apocalypse 
weapon! 

http://rezn8d.net/2012/04/05/russian-president-wields- 

zombie-apocalypse-weapon/ 

• HAARP 901: “Tales from the Crypt” Deleted Internet Pages 
http: //rezn8d. com/haarp/haarpgate.html 


Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5-supported browser is required for video 
playback. Get the latest Flash Player Learn more about upgrading to an 
HTML5 browser 


VIDEO TRANSCRIPT: 

NikolaTesla, Inventor of the Death Ray, died in Jan, 1943 wherein the 
FBI took possession of his papers and documents. 

After WWII, Operation “Overcast” (Later named opertion Paper Clip) 
was a US program to employ NAZI regime scientists in US 
laboratories. 

The National Security Act, passed in 1947 Created the Central 
Intelligence Agency and made possible the rise of the military industrial 
complex 

to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted 
without public knowledge or Congressional oversight. 

In 1958, the military announced they were experimenting on the 
ionosphere with electronic beams for the purpose of manipulating the 
weather. 

In 1962 Respected Meteolrologist Harry Wexler proposed 
geoengineering strategies to warm the planet. 

In 1963 the National Academy of Scientists proposed formation of a 
panel to create a “National Weather and Climate Modification 
Program”. 

In 1966 Plans to warm the arctic were abandoned without comment to 
be replaced with warnings that CO2 was already causing the 
atmosphere to get warmer. 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 19 / 23 







This video introduces the article. Global Warming Linked to Advanced 
Climate Change Technology. 

The title sounds provocative but NASA has concluded that man-made, 
persistent contrails are exacerbating global warming and could 
contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate. 

The article explores the forgotten history of America’s National 
Weather and Climate Modification Program - Still in existance - and 
how it rapidly evolved into a military/civilian weather warfare 
program of mass destruction. 

The documentation and subsequent critique reveals a program that 
went into rapid mission creep when the military became involved. The 
critique was drafted in 1986 by a member of the Union of Atomic 
Scientists. 

The record shows that industrialists and their scientists have been 
looking for ways to warm the arctic for 100 years beginning in 1877 
when Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed diverting warm 
Atlantic water into the Arctic Sea. 

Decades of arctic warming proposals followed until 1962 when 
respected MIT meteorologist, Harry Wexler proposed 3 schemes to 
increase the global temperature of the Earth by i.7°C,: 

(1) Detonate 10 hydrogen bombs in the arctic ocean to send ice crystals 
into the polar atmosphere 

(2) Destroy the ozone layer by using aircraft to spray chlorine or 
bromine into the stratosphere . 

(3) Launch dust particles into equatorial orbit to diffuse light to heat to 
warm the polar regions. 

These ideas sound pretty frightening today, but in 1962 Wexler’s ideas 
were gaining traction and nobody “important” was calling him a 
lunatic. But following Wexler’s untimely death that same year the 
problem of how to warm the planet completely reversed polarity. 
Suddenly - and without explanation - it was now imperative to find 
ways to cool the planet and to keep the atmosphere from warming. 

The U-turn in national direction came about when a paper was 
published by oceanographer, Roger Revelle who claimed earth’s 
atmosphere was warming due to a buidup of carbon dioxide from 
burning coal back in the industrial age. 

The new narrtive became “official” for media consumption in 1966 
when Gordon MacDonald - Chairman of the new ICAS Select Panel 
on Weather and Climate Modification stated: “Carbon dioxide placed in 
the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution has produced 
an increase in the average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a 
few tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.” 

Wexler’s proposals to warm the planet were never mentioned again but 
remained quietly popular with stakeholders in the oil and energy 
markets who had always seen vast opportunities for new shipping lanes 
and drilling as soon as the ice melted a bit. 

In view of NASA’s position that man-made persistent contrails are 
exacerbating global warming - what are we to think? 

If these man-made clouds are normal water vapor we have a problem 
that accelerates global warming. But If the problem can be fixed, and 
no governrnment authority has yet thought it was important enough 
to take immediate action we can reasonably assume that warming the 
climate with persistent contrails is a tolerable or even desired outcome. 

And if If man-made clouds are revealed to be chemical aerosols 
deliberately sprayed into the atmosphere we can reasonably assume 
that heating the atmosphere is a hidden agenda inside a covert aerosol 
operation that mimmicks the appearance of a geoengineering plan to 
cool the planet. In reality, the chemical aerosol operations provide 
plausible deniablity to spectators that our benevolent government is 
secretly spraying the skies to test ways to mitigate global warming for 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 20 / 23 




the good of humanity. 

This plausible deniaility is taught to us through media coverage of 
geoengineers lake David Keith who presents aerosol “cooling” strategies 
in frequent public appearances that are - in turn - presented as news 
in multiple media sources.. 

So, the agenda to warm the planet is cleverly hidden in plain sight 
disguised as an undisclosed but benevolent government program to test 
aerosol spraying to cool the planet if we should ever decide it’s 
necessary. Meanwhile, arctic ice continues to retreat despite decades of 
“testing”. 

Aerosols are not the sole requirement in advanced climate change 
technology. High energy ionospheric heaters, Tesla Arrays, and exotic 
electromagnetic devices are required to interact with chemical aerosols 
in ways that normal water vapor contrails never could. 


Share this: 

0 Twitter 

★ Like ^ 
6 bloggers like this. 


0 FacebooM 


nn' 


Related 

1966 NASA 
Document Reveals 
Future Goal of 
Engineered "Climate 
Modification" 

In "Chemtrail" 


Government 
Documents Link 
Global Warming to 
Advanced Military 
Climate Modification 
Technology 
In "Chemtrail 11 


Geoengineering, 
Chemtrails and The 
Climate Industrial 
Complex 
In "Chemtrail" 


United Nations Promotes 
Population Control Vaccine 


Power Point on Weather > 
Modification and Advanced 
Weapons Technology 


16 comments 



REPLY 


Don Quixote de la Mancha says: 

NOVEMBER 10, 2014 AT 7:46 PM 
^3 fo © Rate This 
fantastic research H. ! 
lots of new info for me 

I am guessing that young Mr. Wexler’s heart attack was no accident. 


502 tatianaaklimenkokostanian says: reply 

NOVEMBER 11, 2014 AT 6:09 AM 

4i To © Rate This 
Please tell us more about, Mr. Wexler ! 


Pingback: 1966 NASA Document Reveals Goal of Engineered “Climate 
Modification” | 502tatianaaklimenkokostanian's Blog 


J hsaive 


■ says: 

NOVEMBER 11, 2014 AT 10:48 AM 
A o o Rate This 


REPLY 


Info on Harry Wexler is available in many sources and books. Here’s a 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 21/23 

















start - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Wexler 


Pingback: 1966 NASA Document Reveals Goal of Engineered “Climate 
Modification” - Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon | Thought Crime 
Radio 




Anunnaki Princess (@klnapp6g) says: 

NOVEMBER 11, 2014 AT 11:38 AM 
o Rate This 


Looks like Wexler was waxed 


REPLY 


□ 


Muhammad Zafrullah says: reply 

NOVEMBER 11, 2014 AT 3:58 PM 
4o To © Rate This 
Scientific thought is like a ship in doldrums, at the mercy of fitful gusts 
of the wind of personal views of people w a say. 


Pingback: *HOT HEADLINES! - PLUS, THE HAWK’S WEEKLY 
SPECIAL BROADCAST! | intelwars2 


Pingback: 2012 IPCC Risk Management Study Ignores Covert Climate 
Engineering « Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon 


□ 


haunebu7 says: 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 AT 4:16 AM 

4oTo © Rate This 
Reblogged this on Haunebu7 ? s Blog . 


REPLY 



blissmax says: 

DECEMBER 19, 2014 AT 9:07 1 


REPLY 


4o To © Rate This 

Reblogged this on the-real-institute.com and commented: 

At one time a lot of investigation was to deliberately warm our climate, 
then it changed... Once again great work from Harold, much 
appreciated thank you. 




koka SKYrecordz says: 

DECEMBER 26, 2014 AT 3:16 AM 
A o o Rate This 


Reblogged this on skywatchMARL 


Westphalia. 


REPLY 


Pingback: 1966 NASA Document Reveals Goal of Engineered “Climate 
Modification” | ingaorama 


Pingback: Chemtrails Are Coal Ash - Really? « Chemtrails: The Exotic 
Weapon 



Pat says: 

FEBRUARY 7, 2015 AT 12:24 PM 


Ao o Rate This 


Reblogged this on POPS. 


REPLY 


Pingback: Controlling/Modifying the Weather | Aisle C 


Leave a Reply 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 22 / 23 
























Enter your comment here... 


Blog at WordPress.com. | The Newsy Theme. Design by Themify. 


O Follow 


Generated with www.html-to-pdf.net 


Page 23 / 23 










